From our short film ‘Jeté’, we were able to gain a lot of audience feedback. I showed our film to a few audience members and I decided to write a few of the main responses down on post-it notes to document it. The following points were made by audience members:
1. Interesting opening sequence. This was due to the fact that we decided to incorporate it in the film rather than editing them in during the post production. A lot of people liked this idea as it was visually interesting and unusual. One audience member commented that this was similar to the opening sequence of ‘Napoleon Dynamite’, which was where we took inspiration from.
2. Good variety of camera shots used for the representations throughout the film. This was good because we had tried to incorporate a range of different camera angles and movements to show different representations of characters in the piece and help to reflect Faye’s mood.
3. The music used suited the style and genre of the piece. The music used was ballet music which we thought would complement the style of the film as it revolves around dancing. We also used Idina Menzel’s ‘Brave’ which one person picked up that the lyrics reflect the story of the piece.
4. Good use of montage shots. Some audience members commented that the montage shots were effective as they showed both time passing and a wide range of dance movements, some of which were known to the general public who do not dance, which was effective as they were able to recognise them.
5. Interesting perspective in the audition scene with the judges backs to the camera. This was because it added tension to the scene as it constantly reminded the audience that they were watching. They also found it visually effective as it seemed to frame Faye as she was dancing.
6. Camerawork could have been better in the scene with Faye’s friends. The comment was made that the camera movement could have been better sorted in the scene in which Faye talks to her friends. This was because the pan that we used was messy and the audience found the switching back and forth a bit confusing.
We also recieved the followong feedback on the two ancillary tasks:
1. The poster looks very professional; however it was felt that both the poster and review looked too similar due to the fact that the same picture was used for each.
2. It was said that the picture on the review was striking and drew them in as an audience. The fact that it is on a white background helps this because there is nothing to distract the eye away from the main picture and the text. To do this we used Photoshop to make the background colour and to make certain features on the picture stand out.
We decided to use the same image for both ancillary tasks because we felt that this would link the two together. On our first attempt at the poster, we used a screen shot from the film as we felt that this would link directly to the film, however we decided that this didn’t work because after feedback, we found that the audience found the picture of a bad quality and looked unprofessional. We also drastically changed our review from our first draft to our final review. This was because after having received feedback, we found that the audience didn’t think it looked like a conventional double page spread.